|
It's poor when 2 people are on different extensions. I've had this phone for over a year.The Panasonic batteries are the biggest problem, because they fail after short periods and can be very expensive. (As another review suggested, I'm now trying the Energizer NiMH replacements, but it's too soon to tell).Also, the additional headsets are markedly overpriced.Otherwise, sound quality is fair to good. Also, when on speakerphone, voicemail systems seem unable to hear the touchtones at times, so one needs to switch to using the handset directly.We're still using these phones, but obtained a new set from Uniden (with which I've had much greater success) in case these give us further trouble. Would recommend avoiding this series of Panasonic phones.
The customer service agent I spoke to promised to send me a replacement battery free of charge.March 31, 2005: When after three weeks of my March 8th call I did not receive the battery, I called Panasonic again. I think Panasonic's modus operandi is quite disgusting. In particular, since December 2004, in less than one year from the initial purchase, I was unable to charge the battery from the base unit. It is with great frustration that I am writing this product review. It is now abundantly clear to me that Panasonic works on deception and cheats its customers out of the value of their product. I complained about the defective battery on March 8, 2005, before Panasonic's March 19, 2005 decision to suspend sending out the replacement batteries.
This time, the customer service agent told me that Panasonic had stopped sending the batteries for Model KX-TG2700 as of March 19, 2005.Hence, I am now concluding that Panasonic customer service has been giving me a run around to save Panasonic a mere $15, the cost of the battery.
This time, the customer service agent told me that there had been an error in processing my order.
Now I am realizing that it was a big mistake giving my business to Panasonic.
I have had too much trouble with the battery for the cordless telephone handset (Model KX-TG2700S) and I have complained to Panasonics as described below.March 8, 2005: I made the first call to Panasonic (1-800-211-7262) to explain that the original battery (Model N4HKGMA00001) for my telephone's handset had stopped working.
I bought an expensive phone believing it to be a good purchase.
The agent then went on to process the order again and provided me an order number.
April 16, 2005: Once again I did not receive the battery even after two weeks of my March 31st call, so I called Panasonic again.
I do understand that the batteries have to be replaced from time to time, and I also understood when I bought the phone that the original battery would last for at least 2 years (as reiterated by Panasonic's customer service agent during my March 8, 2005 call).I believe that Panasonic is willing to lose a customer who would buy more products in future to save a mere $15.
In light of the lousy customer service provided to me, I will not buy any Panasonic products in future.
Also the 2.4Ghz seems to interfere with the wireless video kit that I just got, so I'm thinking of moving to a 5.8Ghz system with an extra handset. I hardly ever hear that annoying beep anymore.I'm satisfied with the phone overall.
The feature are decent and I like the handset speakerphone. I've had this phone for a couple of years now.
We finally got the Energizer ER-P511 battery and it made a huge improvement. We had a lot of trouble with the battery at first.
It eventually got so bad that we started using the base to make calls. Some of my complaints is that the expansion handsets seem a little pricey.
However, there does not seem to be too much interference with my 2.4ghz DLINK DI-514.
We decided to spring for what we thought were 'high-end' phones and got a terrible phone instead.We will probably try to find the Energizer ER-P511 batteries to see if that solves our problems. I suspect their recharging unit is not very smart, and thus they kill the batteries thanks to overcharging due to the so-called battery 'memory effort,' but I do not know this fer sure. Oh, let us count the ways:1) The battery life, as everyone mentions, is horrible. But I'm tempted to go back to old but far more reliable phones. The battery in one phone has now died on us, one is now so faint you can barely hear it, and the last one doesn't recharge much, and dies within the span of a 10 minute conversation when 'fully' charged.2) There is also a short in the system, possibly related to the bad battery life, that results in the LCD screen blanking out when the phone is on the charger, and it only sometimes comes back alive. This makes the nice Caller ID LCD feature often useless.3) They are NOT at all cheap for this level of crappiness. Alas, if only our cell phones worked in the house. (DON'T get me started on that one.).
This is unacceptable. When I saw the verbose feature list on this phone plus the 2.4Ghz range, I jumped.I liked the cell phone like approach to storing numbers, though the interface is quite clunky. I've owned Panasonic phones pretty much for the last 10 years and they've all been great. For some reason, the LCD panel has gotten so faded that I can barely read it without extreme darkness. Sometimes it's hard to figure out your way back to the main menu.Anyway, the main beef I have with this phone is battery life and construction quality. I've had the phone for less than a year and the battery has reached the point where it starts beeping after having one conversation on the phone. I tried to adjust the contrast but nothing happened. Luckily I bought this phone with a 2yr replacement warranty at Best Buy and I'm returning it and its accessory phone to get a better system.I was very happy with the features but the promise was greater than the execution.
|
